If this was less, Sagar, in his commentaries tries to lecture on Advaita Philosophy. Sagar makes Mata Yashoda say dialogues explaining Advaita Vada and even allows Krishna to sermon Radha Mata on the glories of the deviant philosophy. The worse part however is trying to introduce "advaita vada" in a significant work which discards the philosophy. However, this adaptation takes too many liberties in order to introduce drama.
Sagar's Ramayan is better made in this sense, as it adheres to the original epic of Valmiki and the later work of Tulsidas ji. However, it becomes important to understand an adaptation of the Srimad Bhagavatam, more specifically the pastimes of Lord Shri Krishna. There is not much point in getting into the specifics of how the subsequent Acharyas defeated Shankaracharya ji's Mayavada. Sadly, however, the Mayavada Bhashya of Adi Shankaracharya is today read as the most prominent understanding of the Sutras. Srila Veda Vyas compiled the Vedant Sutras, and in order to explain their actual purport compiled the Srimad Bhagavatam which was a natural commentation of the Sutras.
0 kommentar(er)
